ETHO vs. PHO
ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Etho Climate Leadership Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 34.51% vs -3.67% for PHO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PHO.
Performance
ETHO vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -5.40% return.
ETHO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -7.93%
- 1Y
- -3.67%
- 3Y*
- 7.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
ETHO vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 17.28% | 10.23% | 8.17% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -5.40% | 7.62% | 9.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHO and PHO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ETHO and PHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
ETHO vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ETHO
PHO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
ETHO
PHO
Industrials
ETHO
PHO
Financial Services
ETHO
PHO
Healthcare
ETHO
PHO
Consumer Cyclical
ETHO
PHO
-
Real Estate
ETHO
PHO
-
Consumer Defensive
ETHO
PHO
-
Communication Services
ETHO
PHO
-
Basic Materials
ETHO
PHO
Utilities
ETHO
PHO
Energy
ETHO
PHO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHO vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHO
PHO
ETHO vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHO | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | -0.25 | +2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.79 | -0.25 | +3.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.97 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | -0.27 | +4.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | -0.69 | +15.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHO | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | -0.25 | +2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.34 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
ETHO vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHO | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -55.62% | +30.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -13.78% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -10.62% | +9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -10.18% | +5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 5.31% | -2.93% |
Volatility
ETHO vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHO | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.01% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 10.92% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 15.03% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 18.35% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 19.45% | -0.05% |
ETHO vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHO vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than PHO's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 0.73% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHO and PHO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHO has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to PHO (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 34.51% vs -3.67% for PHO. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 34.51% return vs -3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.
ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.58% for PHO.
ETHO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PHO is Water Equities. ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.60% for PHO.
ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHO and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer