ETHO vs. BLOK
ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Etho Climate Leadership Index, while BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. ETHO is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 34.51% vs 30.79% for BLOK. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
ETHO vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK's 16.21% return.
ETHO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHO vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 17.28% | 10.23% | 8.17% |
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | 32.64% | 63.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHO and BLOK is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between ETHO and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
ETHO vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ETHO
BLOK
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Technology
ETHO
BLOK
Industrials
ETHO
BLOK
Financial Services
ETHO
BLOK
Healthcare
ETHO
BLOK
-
Consumer Cyclical
ETHO
BLOK
Real Estate
ETHO
BLOK
Consumer Defensive
ETHO
BLOK
-
Communication Services
ETHO
BLOK
Basic Materials
ETHO
BLOK
-
Utilities
ETHO
BLOK
-
Energy
ETHO
BLOK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHO vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
ETHO
BLOK
ETHO vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 0.87 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 1.90 | +12.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 0.81 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.48 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
ETHO vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -73.33% | +47.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -35.64% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -10.16% | +9.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -26.08% | +21.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 16.23% | -13.85% |
Volatility
ETHO vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 4.11%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHO | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 10.59% | -6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 28.55% | -15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 38.29% | -20.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 42.36% | -22.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 38.97% | -19.57% |
ETHO vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHO vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 0.73% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHO and BLOK have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to ETHO (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs BLOK's -73.33%.
On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 34.51% vs 30.79% for BLOK. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 34.51% return vs 30.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.
ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.
ETHO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BLOK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.71% for BLOK.
ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHO and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer