ETHE vs. FSOL
ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) and FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHE is passively managed, while FSOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FSOL.
Performance
ETHE vs. FSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETHE having a -39.63% return and FSOL slightly lower at -41.01%.
ETHE
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- -23.64%
- YTD
- -39.63%
- 6M
- -42.89%
- 1Y
- -32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- -11.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHE vs. FSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | -39.63% | -4.95% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHE and FSOL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHE vs. FSOL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHE
FSOL
ETHE vs. FSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHE | FSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHE | FSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.99 | +1.05 |
Drawdowns
ETHE vs. FSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHE drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than FSOL's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE and FSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHE | FSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.26% | -50.54% | -45.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.17% | -50.54% | -26.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.23% | -29.21% | -43.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.98% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHE vs. FSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHE | FSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.31% | 71.65% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.26% | 71.65% | +10.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.84% | 71.65% | +120.19% |
ETHE vs. FSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHE vs. FSOL - Dividend Comparison
ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FSOL's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | 1.35% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHE and FSOL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.
FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.35% for ETHE.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETHE and 0.25% for FSOL.
Find the right allocation for ETHE and FSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer