ETHB vs. SLV
ETHB (iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
ETHB vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETHB
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -23.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
ETHB vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | -13.09% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -13.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHB and SLV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHB vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
ETHB
SLV
ETHB vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.98 | 0.25 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
ETHB vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHB drawdown since its inception was -25.90%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.90% | -76.28% | +50.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.90% | -37.30% | +11.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -44.67% | +36.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.67% | — |
Volatility
ETHB vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHB | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 58.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.62% | 58.90% | -11.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.62% | 36.15% | +11.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.62% | 31.84% | +15.78% |
ETHB vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHB vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHB nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHB and SLV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
ETHB and SLV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETHB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SLV is Silver. ETHB tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHB and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for ETHB and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer