ETHB vs. IBLC
ETHB (iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from iShares - ETHB tracks the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant while IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
ETHB vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETHB
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -25.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 31.00%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 64.83%
- 3Y*
- 50.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHB vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | -14.37% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 33.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHB and IBLC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHB vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
ETHB
IBLC
ETHB vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHB | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.05 | 0.39 | -1.44 |
Drawdowns
ETHB vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHB drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHB | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.98% | -62.54% | +35.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.98% | -13.87% | -13.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -25.88% | +17.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.58% | — |
Volatility
ETHB vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHB | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.27% | 54.80% | -7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.27% | 64.46% | -17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.27% | 64.46% | -17.19% |
ETHB vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHB vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
ETHB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.82% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHB and IBLC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.00% for ETHB.
ETHB tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHB and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for ETHB and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer