PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHB vs. IBLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHB vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ETHB

1D
-1.47%
1M
-25.16%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBLC

1D
-1.01%
1M
8.35%
YTD
31.00%
6M
11.45%
1Y
64.83%
3Y*
50.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHB vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETHB and IBLC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHB vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHB

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHB vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ETHB vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHBIBLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

0.39

-1.44

Drawdowns

ETHB vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHB drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB and IBLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHBIBLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-62.54%

+35.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.98%

-13.87%

-13.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-25.88%

+17.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.58%

Volatility

ETHB vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHBIBLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.27%

54.80%

-7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.27%

64.46%

-17.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.27%

64.46%

-17.19%

ETHB vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHB vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

ETHB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ETHB
iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
4.82%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHB and IBLC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.00% for ETHB.

ETHB tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHB and 0.47% for IBLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHB and IBLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer