PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHB vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHB vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ETHB

1D
-1.47%
1M
-25.16%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCDF

1D
0.11%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
3.34%
6M
2.87%
1Y
6.42%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHB vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETHB and BCDF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHB vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHB

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHB vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ETHB vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHBBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

0.39

-1.44

Drawdowns

ETHB vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHB drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, roughly equal to the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB and BCDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHBBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-27.70%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.98%

-7.53%

-19.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-9.83%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

Volatility

ETHB vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHBBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.27%

14.75%

+32.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.27%

16.94%

+30.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.27%

16.94%

+30.33%

ETHB vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHB vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

ETHB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.44%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%
ETHB
iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHB and BCDF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.00% for ETHB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHB and 0.85% for BCDF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHB and BCDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer