ETHA vs. RBIL
ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHA is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHA returned -31.79% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. ETHA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
ETHA vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -39.46% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.
ETHA
- 1D
- -5.56%
- 1M
- -23.58%
- YTD
- -39.46%
- 6M
- -42.75%
- 1Y
- -31.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -39.46% | 19.12% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA and RBIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHA vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA
RBIL
ETHA vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHA | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 2.39 | -1.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 17.00 | -17.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 70.66 | -71.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHA | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 5.01 | -5.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 4.28 | -4.69 |
Drawdowns
ETHA vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -0.50% | -63.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.89% | -0.27% | -62.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.89% | 0.00% | -62.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -0.06% | -32.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.73% | 0.07% | +37.66% |
Volatility
ETHA vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that ETHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 0.30% | +9.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.25% | 0.79% | +45.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.61% | 0.92% | +67.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.53% | 1.05% | +71.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.53% | 1.05% | +71.48% |
ETHA vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHA vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHA and RBIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHA has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHA dropped -64.02% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.57% vs -31.79% for ETHA. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.57% return vs -31.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHA.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.
ETHA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHA and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHA and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer