PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHA vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHA vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -43.96% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 21.54% return.


ETHA

1D
-1.02%
1M
-27.59%
YTD
-43.96%
6M
-45.98%
1Y
-34.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVLV

1D
0.72%
1M
3.54%
YTD
21.54%
6M
21.48%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHA vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
-43.96%-11.31%-4.89%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
21.54%15.12%4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHA and AVLV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHA vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHA
ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHA vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETHAAVLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.56

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

6.07

-6.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

24.12

-25.10

ETHA vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHA Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHA and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHA vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -67.56%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHAAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.56%

-19.50%

-48.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.56%

-6.39%

-61.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.65%

0.00%

-65.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

-3.91%

-29.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.22%

1.61%

+37.61%

Volatility

ETHA vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a higher volatility of 17.30% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.67%. This indicates that ETHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHAAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.30%

3.67%

+13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.58%

9.33%

+37.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.29%

12.52%

+56.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.65%

17.34%

+55.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.65%

17.34%

+55.31%

ETHA vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ETHA vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.37%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHA and AVLV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHA has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to AVLV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHA dropped -67.56% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 1-year performance, AVLV leads with 39.76% vs -34.33% for ETHA. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 39.76% return vs -34.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHA.

AVLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.

ETHA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AVLV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHA and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHA and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer