ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L
ETHA.DE (21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHA.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by 21Shares, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. ETHA.DE is actively managed, while SSLN.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETHA.DE returned -7.20%/yr vs 35.13%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHA.DE charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ETHA.DE is traded in EUR, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHA.DE achieves a -45.84% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's -14.83% return.
ETHA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -23.09%
- YTD
- -45.84%
- 6M
- -45.24%
- 1Y
- -33.71%
- 3Y*
- -7.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -18.99%
- YTD
- -14.83%
- 6M
- -15.54%
- 1Y
- 65.72%
- 3Y*
- 35.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHA.DE 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP | -45.84% | -22.34% | 52.23% | 90.31% | -66.47% | -0.42% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -14.83% | 118.25% | 29.15% | -4.21% | 9.79% | -2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA.DE and SSLN.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA.DE
SSLN.L
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHA.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.24 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.41 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 3.19 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -77.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA.DE and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.82% | -77.65% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.69% | -46.47% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.69% | -46.47% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.10% | -45.65% | -22.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.64% | -58.10% | +12.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.34% | 20.53% | +18.81% |
Volatility
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHA.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.35% compared to iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) at 14.40%. This indicates that ETHA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.35% | 14.40% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.87% | 53.19% | -12.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.46% | 56.21% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.57% | 37.01% | +29.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.57% | 31.16% | +35.41% |
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA.DE has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHA.DE vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHA.DE nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHA.DE and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for ETHA.DE.
ETHA.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SSLN.L is Silver. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for ETHA.DE and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for ETHA.DE and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer