ETGIX vs. MASGX
ETGIX (Eaton Vance Greater India Fund) and MASGX (Matthews Asia ESG Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ETGIX returned 7.68%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for MASGX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETGIX charges 1.57%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for MASGX.
Performance
ETGIX vs. MASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETGIX achieves a -9.52% return, which is significantly lower than MASGX's 54.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ETGIX has underperformed MASGX with an annualized return of 7.68%, while MASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.74% annualized return.
ETGIX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- -9.52%
- 6M
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- -10.98%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
MASGX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 54.22%
- 6M
- 55.12%
- 1Y
- 76.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.74%
ETGIX vs. MASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | -9.52% | -2.06% | 17.55% | 20.60% | -19.86% | 25.74% | 17.64% | 10.52% | -12.14% | 44.79% |
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 54.22% | 22.83% | -2.51% | 7.99% | -14.37% | 5.33% | 42.90% | 12.56% | -9.70% | 33.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETGIX and MASGX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ETGIX and MASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETGIX vs. MASGX — Risk / Return Rank
ETGIX
MASGX
ETGIX vs. MASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETGIX | MASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.58 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 5.65 | -6.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 20.01 | -21.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETGIX vs. MASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than MASGX's maximum drawdown of -36.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETGIX and MASGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETGIX | MASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -36.34% | -37.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.03% | -14.20% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.22% | -24.94% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.84% | -36.34% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -36.34% | -6.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.76% | 0.00% | -19.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.85% | -11.19% | -15.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 3.96% | +6.26% |
Volatility
ETGIX vs. MASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) is 3.51%, while Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a volatility of 12.46%. This indicates that ETGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETGIX | MASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 12.46% | -8.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 22.07% | -9.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 24.62% | -10.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 21.44% | -6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 19.03% | -1.38% |
ETGIX vs. MASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETGIX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than MASGX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETGIX vs. MASGX - Dividend Comparison
ETGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.99%, more than MASGX's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | 15.99% | 14.47% | 4.07% | 4.85% | 21.62% | 8.60% | 0.24% | 2.79% | 1.17% | 3.32% | 0.56% | 0.79% |
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 3.62% | 5.58% | 2.58% | 7.52% | 5.39% | 2.60% | 5.66% | 1.36% | 4.52% | 3.70% | 1.47% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETGIX and MASGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MASGX has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to ETGIX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETGIX dropped -73.62% vs MASGX's -36.34%.
MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETGIX and MASGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer