ETG vs. PM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ETG (Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund) is Global Equities fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ETG returned 12.99%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for PM. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ETG vs. PM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETG achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 10.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ETG has outperformed PM with an annualized return of 12.99%, while PM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.06% annualized return.

ETG

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: 21.34%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

PM

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 18.07%
• 1Y: -0.11%
• 3Y*: 29.88%
• 5Y*: 17.91%
• 10Y*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETG vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund	2.94%	36.92%	15.46%	21.97%	-27.62%	33.08%	10.08%	43.62%	-15.90%	33.55%
PM Philip Morris International Inc.	10.67%	37.99%	34.34%	-1.85%	12.31%	20.78%	3.69%	35.02%	-33.30%	19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ETG and PM is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2008	0.34

The correlation between ETG and PM shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETG vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETG

ETG Risk / Return Rank: 23
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

PM

PM Risk / Return Rank: 37
PM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PM Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PM Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PM Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETG vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETG	PM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	-0.00	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	0.18	+1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.02	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	-0.01	+1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.47	-0.01	+5.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETG vs. PM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETG Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the PM Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETG and PM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETG	PM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	-0.00	+1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.79	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.45	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.52	-0.14

Drawdowns

ETG vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETG drawdown since its inception was -74.76%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETG and PM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETG	PM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.76%	-42.87%	-31.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.64%	-20.64%	+4.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.95%	-20.64%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.64%	-22.78%	-8.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.53%	-42.87%	-8.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-8.30%	+6.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.48%	-10.03%	-3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	10.75%	-6.56%

Volatility

ETG vs. PM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) is 4.76%, while Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a volatility of 9.48%. This indicates that ETG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETG	PM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	9.48%	-4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	20.96%	-8.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	27.55%	-12.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.82%	22.69%	-2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	24.43%	-3.18%

Dividends

ETG vs. PM - Dividend Comparison

ETG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than PM's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund	6.72%	6.72%	8.03%	7.02%	9.94%	6.02%	6.74%	6.83%	9.08%	7.69%	8.74%	7.93%
PM Philip Morris International Inc.	3.27%	3.52%	4.40%	5.46%	4.98%	5.16%	5.73%	5.43%	6.73%	3.99%	4.50%	4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETG and PM in my portfolio?

ETG and PM have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETG or PM?

PM has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to ETG (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETG dropped -74.76% vs PM's -42.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.