ETG vs. EEIAX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ETG (Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund) and EEIAX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund) are both mutual funds - ETG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while EEIAX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, ETG returned 13.13%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for EEIAX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETG charges 2.57%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for EEIAX.

Performance

ETG vs. EEIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETG having a 4.99% return and EEIAX slightly lower at 4.79%. Over the past 10 years, ETG has outperformed EEIAX with an annualized return of 13.13%, while EEIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return.

ETG

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 2.00%
• 6M: 3.65%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

EEIAX

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 3.66%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 1Y: 15.08%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETG vs. EEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund	4.99%	36.92%	15.46%	21.97%	-27.62%	33.08%	10.08%	43.62%	-15.90%	33.55%
EEIAX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund	4.79%	23.43%	-1.23%	13.63%	-11.99%	-7.64%	4.68%	22.66%	-8.38%	16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ETG and EEIAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007	0.45

The correlation between ETG and EEIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (10 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETG vs. EEIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETG

ETG Risk / Return Rank: 26
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

EEIAX

EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETG vs. EEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETG	EEIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.99	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.84	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.38	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	2.00	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	7.18	-2.78

ETG vs. EEIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETG Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the EEIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETG and EEIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETG vs. EEIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETG drawdown since its inception was -74.76%, which is greater than EEIAX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETG and EEIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETG	EEIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.76%	-31.70%	-43.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.64%	-7.40%	-9.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.95%	-9.34%	-7.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.64%	-25.94%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.53%	-28.43%	-23.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-1.13%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.42%	-8.87%	-4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	2.06%	+2.16%

Volatility

ETG vs. EEIAX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) at 2.16%. This indicates that ETG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETG	EEIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	2.16%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.99%	6.55%	+6.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.79%	7.44%	+8.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.86%	8.22%	+11.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	8.36%	+12.81%

ETG vs. EEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETG has a 2.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EEIAX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETG vs. EEIAX - Dividend Comparison

ETG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than EEIAX's 9.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEIAX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund	9.97%	8.48%	11.19%	11.34%	13.39%	11.14%	9.77%	13.03%	10.48%	8.74%	10.80%	11.65%
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund	6.62%	6.72%	8.03%	7.02%	9.94%	6.02%	6.74%	6.83%	9.08%	7.69%	8.74%	7.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETG and EEIAX in my portfolio?

ETG and EEIAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETG or EEIAX?

ETG has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to EEIAX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETG dropped -74.76% vs EEIAX's -31.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.