ETFT vs. IDV
ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ETFT is actively managed, while IDV is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETFT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
ETFT vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 10.59% return.
ETFT
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDV
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 33.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
ETFT vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | -1.97% | -0.01% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 10.59% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFT and IDV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETFT vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
ETFT
IDV
ETFT vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETFT | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.21 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
ETFT vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFT | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -70.14% | +55.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.50% | -4.30% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -15.39% | +10.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
ETFT vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETFT | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 12.94% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 15.55% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 17.94% | -2.35% |
ETFT vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETFT vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.52% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETFT and IDV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ETFT.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.
They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.49% for IDV.
Find the right allocation for ETFT and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer