ETFT vs. IDV
ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ETFT is actively managed, while IDV is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETFT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
ETFT vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFT achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 7.44% return.
ETFT
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDV
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
ETFT vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | -1.78% | 0.06% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 7.44% | 3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFT and IDV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETFT vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
ETFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDV
ETFT vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETFT | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETFT vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFT drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFT and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFT | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -70.14% | +55.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -7.03% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -15.35% | +10.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.57% | — |
Volatility
ETFT vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETFT | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 13.21% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 15.59% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 17.64% | -2.47% |
ETFT vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETFT vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
ETFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFT Fundsmith Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 5.53% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETFT and IDV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ETFT.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 0.00% for ETFT.
They also come from different issuers: Fundsmith and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ETFT and 0.49% for IDV.
Find the right allocation for ETFT and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer