ETFOX vs. CRDBX
Compare and contrast key facts about North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX).
ETFOX is managed by Stadion Funds. It was launched on Apr 29, 2004. CRDBX is managed by Potomac Fund Management Inc.. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020.
Performance
ETFOX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETFOX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFOX North Square Tactical Growth Fund | -3.21% | 14.69% | 15.45% | 16.55% | -14.19% | 12.43% | 17.34% |
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund | 1.84% | 25.36% | 19.91% | 18.44% | -8.22% | 28.08% | 24.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFOX achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 1.84% return.
ETFOX
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -2.49%
- 1Y
- 13.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
CRDBX
- 1D
- 4.87%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 36.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETFOX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFOX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETFOX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank
ETFOX
CRDBX
ETFOX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETFOX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.76 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 3.26 | -1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.61 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 5.17 | -3.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 16.62 | -10.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETFOX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.76 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.01 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.01 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFOX and CRDBX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ETFOX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison
ETFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than CRDBX's 15.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFOX North Square Tactical Growth Fund | 1.34% | 1.29% | 2.36% | 0.98% | 7.75% | 4.75% | 0.02% | 4.81% | 2.65% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 0.64% |
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund | 15.08% | 15.36% | 12.58% | 9.91% | 0.18% | 25.05% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ETFOX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFOX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFOX and CRDBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFOX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.32% | -97.00% | +55.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -7.13% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.86% | -97.00% | +79.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -95.71% | +89.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -25.67% | +20.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.22% | -0.05% |
Volatility
ETFOX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX) is 4.54%, while Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that ETFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETFOX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 5.18% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 10.66% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 21.01% | -6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.46% | 1,635.86% | -1,623.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 1,525.82% | -1,513.44% |