ETFOX vs. GIPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX).
ETFOX is managed by Stadion Funds. It was launched on Apr 29, 2004. GIPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
ETFOX vs. GIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETFOX vs. GIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFOX North Square Tactical Growth Fund | -5.25% | 14.69% | 15.45% | 16.55% | -14.19% | 12.43% | 15.74% | 15.00% | -4.12% | 12.23% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | -2.44% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 7.94% | 11.09% | 15.68% | -6.52% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFOX achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than GIPIX's -2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ETFOX has outperformed GIPIX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while GIPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.45% annualized return.
ETFOX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -6.65%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
GIPIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETFOX vs. GIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFOX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GIPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETFOX vs. GIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
ETFOX
GIPIX
ETFOX vs. GIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETFOX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.14 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.60 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.93 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 4.10 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETFOX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.14 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFOX and GIPIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETFOX vs. GIPIX - Dividend Comparison
ETFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than GIPIX's 5.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFOX North Square Tactical Growth Fund | 1.37% | 1.29% | 2.36% | 0.98% | 7.75% | 4.75% | 0.02% | 4.81% | 2.65% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 0.64% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.95% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
Drawdowns
ETFOX vs. GIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFOX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, which is greater than GIPIX's maximum drawdown of -29.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFOX and GIPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFOX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.32% | -29.46% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -6.33% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.86% | -20.65% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.47% | -20.65% | +2.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.15% | -5.50% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -3.70% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.65% | +0.48% |
Volatility
ETFOX vs. GIPIX - Volatility Comparison
North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) at 2.94%. This indicates that ETFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETFOX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 2.94% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 4.78% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 8.09% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 7.93% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 8.06% | +4.30% |