ETEGX vs. WISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX).
ETEGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997. WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013.
Performance
ETEGX vs. WISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETEGX vs. WISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | -2.47% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -6.00% | 14.87% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.94% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 26.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETEGX achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than WISGX's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ETEGX has underperformed WISGX with an annualized return of 8.12%, while WISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.
ETEGX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
WISGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETEGX vs. WISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than WISGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETEGX vs. WISGX — Risk / Return Rank
ETEGX
WISGX
ETEGX vs. WISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETEGX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | 0.94 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | 1.44 | -1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.19 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 1.52 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 5.85 | -6.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETEGX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 0.94 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.06 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.55 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.44 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETEGX and WISGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETEGX vs. WISGX - Dividend Comparison
ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, while WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 8.44% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
ETEGX vs. WISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETEGX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than WISGX's maximum drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEGX and WISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETEGX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.58% | -43.22% | -24.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -14.26% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.30% | -43.22% | +18.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | -43.22% | +6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -8.74% | -5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -12.69% | -10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 3.69% | +1.78% |
Volatility
ETEGX vs. WISGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) is 5.34%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that ETEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETEGX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 9.23% | -3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 15.49% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 24.34% | -4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 24.44% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 23.93% | -4.11% |