PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETCO vs. NFXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETCO vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCO achieves a -34.69% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.98% return.


ETCO

1D
-2.50%
1M
5.77%
6M
-27.08%
YTD
-34.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NFXS

1D
2.11%
1M
7.73%
6M
11.04%
YTD
24.98%
1Y
52.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-5.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.84K$37.58K$56.92K
$587.15K$968.11K$646.26K

ETCO vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ETCO
Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF
-34.69%-26.08%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
24.98%28.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCO and NFXS is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETCO vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETCO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETCO vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETCONFXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

ETCO vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETCO vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -59.43%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and NFXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETCONFXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.43%

-50.37%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.22%

-12.34%

-42.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.17%

-30.81%

-7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.54%

Volatility

ETCO vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETCONFXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.60%

35.05%

+15.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.60%

34.93%

+15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.60%

34.93%

+15.67%

ETCO vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETCO vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 153.50%, more than NFXS's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ETCO
Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF
153.50%42.29%0.00%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
2.83%3.53%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETCO and NFXS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETCO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETCO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 153.50%, compared with 2.83% for NFXS.

ETCO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 1.03% for NFXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETCO and NFXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer