ETCO vs. GBTC
ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) and GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. ETCO is actively managed, while GBTC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ETCO charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for GBTC.
Performance
ETCO vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCO achieves a -34.69% return, which is significantly lower than GBTC's -28.72% return.
ETCO
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- YTD
- -34.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GBTC
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- -25.46%
- YTD
- -28.72%
- 1Y
- -45.18%
- 3Y*
- 36.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 50.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 54.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.84K | $37.58K | $56.92K | |
| $75.53M | $74.63M | $101.29M |
ETCO vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -34.69% | -26.08% |
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.72% | -22.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCO and GBTC is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCO vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank
ETCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GBTC
ETCO vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETCO | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETCO vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -59.43%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and GBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCO | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.43% | -89.91% | +30.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -85.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.22% | -50.49% | -4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.17% | -43.51% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 34.92% | — |
Volatility
ETCO vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCO | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.60% | 44.36% | +6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.60% | 60.60% | -10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.60% | 81.27% | -30.67% |
ETCO vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCO vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison
ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 153.50%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 153.50% | 42.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCO and GBTC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETCO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETCO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 153.50%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.
Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 1.50% for GBTC.
Find the right allocation for ETCO and GBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer