ETCG vs. IBID
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETCG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Ethereum Classic (ETC), while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETCG returned -66.78% vs 3.48% for IBID. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
ETCG vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -47.46% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 2.35% return.
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -34.35%
- YTD
- -47.46%
- 1Y
- -66.78%
- 3Y*
- -20.02%
- 5Y*
- -37.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.05%
IBID
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $62.63K | $57.03K | $104.25K | |
| $794.12K | $784.31K | $743.37K |
ETCG vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -47.46% | -39.78% | -9.57% | 80.45% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.35% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and IBID is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between ETCG and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
IBID
ETCG vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETCG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.64 | -0.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 6.36 | -7.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 22.33 | -23.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -1.28% | -95.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.70% | -0.55% | -72.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.20% | -0.14% | -96.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.89% | -0.22% | -82.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.47% | 0.16% | +51.31% |
Volatility
ETCG vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that ETCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | 0.32% | +9.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | 0.92% | +32.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.25% | 1.15% | +56.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.69% | 2.21% | +88.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.27% | 2.21% | +112.06% |
ETCG vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and IBID have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETCG has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 3.48% vs -66.78% for ETCG. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 3.48% return vs -66.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.
ETCG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer