ESSC vs. OMFL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eventide Small Cap ETF (ESSC) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).

ESSC and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESSC is an actively managed fund by Eventide. It was launched on Sep 29, 2025. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017.

Performance

ESSC vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide Small Cap ETF (ESSC) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESSC vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESSC Eventide Small Cap ETF	1.16%	3.65%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	-1.41%	1.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESSC achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's -1.41% return.

ESSC

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 4.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMFL

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 13.76%
• 3Y*: 10.17%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESSC vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESSC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.

ESSC

Eventide Small Cap ETF

OMFL

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Return for Risk

ESSC vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 56
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESSC vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Small Cap ETF (ESSC) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESSC	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.63	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between ESSC and OMFL is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ESSC vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

ESSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than OMFL's 0.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESSC Eventide Small Cap ETF	0.19%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.86%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%

Drawdowns

ESSC vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESSC drawdown since its inception was -9.51%, smaller than the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESSC and OMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESSC	OMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.51%	-33.24%	+23.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.40%	-5.20%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-4.89%	+2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESSC	OMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.61%	16.72%	+2.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.61%	16.82%	+2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	20.26%	-0.65%