PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPO vs. SILG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESPO is traded in USD, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than SILG.L's -9.61% return.


ESPO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-15.10%
6M
-16.17%
1Y
-14.01%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*

SILG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-24.04%
YTD
-9.61%
6M
-6.43%
1Y
61.17%
3Y*
42.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-15.10%25.79%47.61%33.64%-13.34%
SILG.L
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-9.61%173.15%11.64%-1.40%-9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and SILG.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPO vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SILG.L
SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESPOSILG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.21

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

1.66

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

4.28

-5.22

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and SILG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPOSILG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-36.77%

-14.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.81%

-36.77%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.81%

-36.77%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.19%

-35.89%

+8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-13.30%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.95%

14.18%

+1.77%

Volatility

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.42%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 16.29%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPOSILG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

16.29%

-11.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

42.79%

-28.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

52.27%

-33.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

42.90%

-17.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.71%

42.90%

-17.19%

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESPO vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while SILG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.47%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%
SILG.L
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESPO and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.65% for SILG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPO and SILG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer