ESPO vs. NACP
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ESPO tracks the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 6.23%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
ESPO vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and NACP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ESPO and NACP shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESPO vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
NACP
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
ESPO
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
NACP
Technology
ESPO
NACP
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
NACP
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
NACP
Energy
ESPO
-
NACP
Financial Services
ESPO
-
NACP
Healthcare
ESPO
-
NACP
Industrials
ESPO
-
NACP
Real Estate
ESPO
-
NACP
Utilities
ESPO
-
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
NACP
ESPO vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.54 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 4.56 | -4.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 20.04 | -20.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 3.14 | -3.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.92 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.93 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -30.96% | -20.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -9.65% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -19.66% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -27.89% | -20.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -0.13% | -25.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -5.75% | -9.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 2.19% | +13.11% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) at 4.44%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.44% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 11.13% | +3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 14.02% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 17.47% | +7.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 18.70% | +7.05% |
ESPO vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and NACP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to NACP (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 6.23% for ESPO. On fees, NACP is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, NACP has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NACP is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer