ESPO vs. LVHI
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 5.88%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
ESPO vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -14.87% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.45% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -18.35%
- 1Y
- -15.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -14.87% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and LVHI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.43 |
The correlation between ESPO and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESPO vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
LVHI
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
ESPO
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
LVHI
Technology
ESPO
LVHI
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
LVHI
Energy
ESPO
-
LVHI
Financial Services
ESPO
-
LVHI
Healthcare
ESPO
-
LVHI
Industrials
ESPO
-
LVHI
Real Estate
ESPO
-
LVHI
Utilities
ESPO
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
LVHI
ESPO vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.58 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 4.84 | -5.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 19.99 | -20.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 3.10 | -3.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 1.42 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.81 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -32.31% | -18.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -6.08% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -11.99% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -11.99% | -36.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.99% | -1.79% | -25.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.05% | -3.52% | -11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.58% | 1.47% | +14.11% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 2.35% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 7.58% | +7.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 9.50% | +9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 11.07% | +14.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 13.76% | +11.98% |
ESPO vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.46% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and LVHI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.67% vs 5.88% for ESPO. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.46% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer