PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPO vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPO vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 8.89% return.


ESPO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-15.10%
6M
-16.17%
1Y
-14.01%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*

EWP

1D
0.63%
1M
4.32%
YTD
8.89%
6M
11.54%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
32.21%
5Y*
17.57%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-15.10%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.49%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
8.89%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and EWP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.48

The correlation between ESPO and EWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESPO vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESPO
EWP

Communication Services

78.1%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%
4.0%

Technology

8.2%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

5.3%

Financial Services

-

41.4%

Healthcare

-

1.3%

Industrials

-

16.1%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Utilities

-

21.2%

Communication Services

ESPO
78.1%
EWP
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ESPO
13.8%
EWP
4.0%

Technology

ESPO
8.2%
EWP
4.9%

Basic Materials

ESPO

-

EWP

-

Consumer Defensive

ESPO

-

EWP

-

Energy

ESPO

-

EWP
5.3%

Financial Services

ESPO

-

EWP
41.4%

Healthcare

ESPO

-

EWP
1.3%

Industrials

ESPO

-

EWP
16.1%

Real Estate

ESPO

-

EWP
2.9%

Utilities

ESPO

-

EWP
21.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPO vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESPOEWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.34

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

3.26

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

11.51

-12.45

ESPO vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPOEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-61.19%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.81%

-11.38%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.81%

-12.19%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.33%

-33.76%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.19%

0.00%

-27.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-21.41%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.95%

3.22%

+12.73%

Volatility

ESPO vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.42%, while iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPOEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

6.21%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

16.09%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

19.13%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

20.31%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.71%

22.22%

+3.49%

ESPO vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESPO vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than EWP's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.47%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.09%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESPO and EWP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs EWP's -61.19%.

On 5-year performance, EWP leads with 17.57% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWP has performed better with a 17.57% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

EWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.

ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EWP is Europe Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.50% for EWP.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPO and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer