PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESPO vs. EWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESPO vs. EWM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while EWM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 5.49%/yr vs 4.69%/yr for EWM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWM.

Performance

ESPO vs. EWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than EWM's 2.89% return.

ESPO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
-15.10%
6M
-16.17%
1Y
-14.92%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
—

EWM

1D
0.25%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
2.89%
6M
6.00%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF		-15.10%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.49%
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF		2.89%15.74%19.46%-3.61%-6.00%-7.40%3.12%-1.41%-3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and EWM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.44

The correlation between ESPO and EWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (5 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESPO vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ESPO
EWM

Communication Services

78.1%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%
1.1%

Technology

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.3%

Energy

-

3.9%

Financial Services

-

46.6%

Healthcare

-

3.8%

Industrials

-

11.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

10.8%

Communication Services

ESPO
78.1%
EWM
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ESPO
13.8%
EWM
1.1%

Technology

ESPO
8.2%
EWM

-

Basic Materials

ESPO

-

EWM
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

ESPO

-

EWM
7.3%

Energy

ESPO

-

EWM
3.9%

Financial Services

ESPO

-

EWM
46.6%

Healthcare

ESPO

-

EWM
3.8%

Industrials

ESPO

-

EWM
11.1%

Real Estate

ESPO

-

EWM

-

Utilities

ESPO

-

EWM
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF

iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF

Often compared with ESPO:
ESPO vs. HEROESPO vs. ESGB.LESPO vs. GAMRESPO vs. NERDESPO vs. VGTESPO vs. MDLZESPO vs. SNSR
Often compared with EWM:
EWM vs. EIDOEWM vs. EWYEWM vs. EWTEWM vs. EPIEWM vs. AAXJEWM vs. VOOEWM vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

ESPO vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
EWM
EWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ESPOEWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.80
1.36

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.02
1.92

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.24

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

2.09

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

6.65

-7.59

ESPO vs. EWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the EWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and EWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and EWM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESPOEWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-89.19%

+38.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.81%

-9.14%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.81%

-21.31%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.33%

-22.76%

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-43.81%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.19%

-9.08%

-18.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-31.80%

+16.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.95%

2.87%

+13.08%

Volatility

ESPO vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 3.97%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESPOEWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

3.97%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

10.95%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

14.10%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

13.72%

+11.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.71%

16.27%

+9.44%

ESPO vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESPO vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than EWM's 3.32% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF		1.47%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF		3.32%3.41%3.32%3.47%3.00%6.48%1.89%2.91%3.84%5.58%5.97%37.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESPO and EWM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESPO has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to EWM (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs EWM's -89.19%.

On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 5.49% vs 4.69% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.

ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EWM is Asia Pacific Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.49% for EWM.

EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPO and EWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer