ESPO vs. EUFN
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 5.49%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for EUFN. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for EUFN.
Performance
ESPO vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than EUFN's 4.75% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -14.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
EUFN
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
ESPO vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -15.10% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 4.75% | 65.73% | 17.20% | 26.15% | -8.78% | 19.13% | -8.55% | 20.73% | -10.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and EUFN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.49 |
The correlation between ESPO and EUFN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPO vs. EUFN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
EUFN
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ESPO
EUFN
Communication Services
ESPO
EUFN
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
EUFN
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
EUFN
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
EUFN
-
Energy
ESPO
-
EUFN
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
EUFN
Healthcare
ESPO
-
EUFN
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
EUFN
Real Estate
ESPO
-
EUFN
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
EUFN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
EUFN
ESPO vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESPO | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.23 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 1.79 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 6.24 | -7.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, roughly equal to the maximum EUFN drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and EUFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -53.25% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -14.77% | -13.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -15.95% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -35.15% | -13.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.19% | -0.10% | -27.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -14.53% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.95% | 4.23% | +11.72% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.42%, while iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 6.96% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 17.05% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 20.17% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 21.88% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 24.53% | +1.18% |
ESPO vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFN's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than EUFN's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.47% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 3.41% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and EUFN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUFN has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs EUFN's -53.25%.
On 5-year performance, EUFN leads with 18.43% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUFN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EUFN is Financials Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.48% for EUFN.
EUFN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and EUFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer