PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESPO vs. BRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESPO vs. BRF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and BRF (VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BRF is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 7.56%/yr vs -3.07%/yr for BRF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BRF.

Performance

ESPO vs. BRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly lower than BRF's 2.26% return.

ESPO

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.26%
6M
-13.63%
YTD
-11.52%
1Y
-13.39%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
—

BRF

1D
-1.60%
1M
-2.39%
6M
-2.83%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
18.94%
3Y*
1.77%
5Y*
-3.07%
10Y*
3.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. BRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF		-11.52%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.49%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF		2.26%54.17%-35.02%37.21%-14.38%-20.40%-21.07%40.66%6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and BRF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.38

ESPO vs. BRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ESPO
BRF

Technology

75.3%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
12.6%

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

12.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Energy

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

9.2%

Healthcare

-

6.1%

Industrials

-

14.0%

Real Estate

-

15.7%

Utilities

-

9.6%

Technology

ESPO
75.3%
BRF
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESPO
14.0%
BRF
12.6%

Communication Services

ESPO
10.6%
BRF

-

Basic Materials

ESPO

-

BRF
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

ESPO

-

BRF
10.1%

Energy

ESPO

-

BRF
4.9%

Financial Services

ESPO

-

BRF
9.2%

Healthcare

ESPO

-

BRF
6.1%

Industrials

ESPO

-

BRF
14.0%

Real Estate

ESPO

-

BRF
15.7%

Utilities

ESPO

-

BRF
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF

VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF

Often compared with ESPO:
ESPO vs. HEROESPO vs. ESGB.LESPO vs. GAMRESPO vs. NERDESPO vs. VGTESPO vs. MDLZESPO vs. SNSR
Often compared with BRF:
BRF vs. EWZBRF vs. EWZSBRF vs. FLNBRF vs. KSABRF vs. TMFCBRF vs. GDXBRF vs. FLBR

Return for Risk

ESPO vs. BRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. BRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ESPOBRFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.72
0.66

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.91
1.06

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.13

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

0.96

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

2.37

-3.13

ESPO vs. BRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the BRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and BRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. BRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum BRF drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and BRF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESPOBRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-82.26%

+31.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.43%

-19.81%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.43%

-37.81%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.33%

-46.60%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-60.43%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.12%

-50.15%

+26.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.18%

-45.75%

+30.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.64%

8.02%

+9.62%

Volatility

ESPO vs. BRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.87%, while VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESPOBRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

7.08%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

23.30%

-8.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

29.03%

-10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.09%

31.63%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.62%

33.83%

-8.21%

ESPO vs. BRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BRF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESPO vs. BRF - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than BRF's 5.42% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF		5.42%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF		1.41%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESPO and BRF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRF has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to ESPO (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs BRF's -82.26%.

On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 7.56% vs -3.07% for BRF. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 7.56% return vs -3.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BRF.

BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 1.41% for ESPO.

ESPO is categorized as Gaming, while BRF is Latin America Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.60% for BRF.

BRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPO and BRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer