ESPO vs. BAMU
ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. ESPO is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, ESPO returned -19.58% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.
Performance
ESPO vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -17.72% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.24% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -17.72%
- 6M
- -18.33%
- 1Y
- -19.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- —
BAMU
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -17.72% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 13.33% |
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.24% | 3.21% | 4.14% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and BAMU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023 | -0.03 |
The correlation between ESPO and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
BAMU
ESPO vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESPO | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 2.43 | -1.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 24.72 | -25.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 97.90 | -99.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and BAMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -0.36% | -50.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.43% | -0.12% | -29.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.43% | 0.00% | -29.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -0.02% | -15.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.70% | 0.03% | +16.67% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 0.09% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 0.39% | +14.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.51% | 0.58% | +17.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 0.86% | +24.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 0.86% | +24.81% |
ESPO vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 3.05% | 3.20% | 3.97% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.51% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and BAMU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs BAMU's -0.36%.
On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.91% vs -19.58% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.91% return vs -19.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.51% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Gaming, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and BAMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer