PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESOA vs. SMMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESOA vs. SMMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 104.87% return, which is significantly higher than SMMT's -19.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ESOA has outperformed SMMT with an annualized return of 28.68%, while SMMT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.31% annualized return.


ESOA

1D
1.83%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
104.87%
6M
93.12%
1Y
51.31%
3Y*
88.21%
5Y*
50.25%
10Y*
28.68%

SMMT

1D
7.11%
1M
-25.44%
YTD
-19.90%
6M
-20.26%
1Y
-30.51%
3Y*
93.96%
5Y*
15.49%
10Y*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESOA vs. SMMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESOA
Energy Services Of America Corp
104.87%-34.42%111.44%140.93%-22.02%223.53%32.47%-30.56%38.82%-36.06%
SMMT
Summit Therapeutics Inc.
-19.90%-1.99%583.72%-38.59%57.99%-42.77%193.75%39.13%-89.62%29.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ESOA and SMMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2015

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESOA:

$293.39M

SMMT:

$10.86B

EPS

ESOA:

$0.55

SMMT:

-$1.60

PB Ratio

ESOA:

3.60

SMMT:

19.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESOA:

$440.96M

SMMT:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESOA:

$52.66M

SMMT:

-$83.36K

EBITDA (TTM)

ESOA:

$27.20M

SMMT:

-$738.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESOA vs. SMMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESOA
ESOA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ESOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ESOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMT
SMMT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SMMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESOA vs. SMMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESOASMMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.98

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

-0.55

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

-0.87

+4.43

ESOA vs. SMMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESOA Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the SMMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESOA and SMMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESOA vs. SMMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, smaller than the maximum SMMT drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and SMMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESOASMMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.67%

-95.75%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.16%

-55.49%

+24.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.43%

-64.44%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.43%

-91.78%

+34.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.62%

-95.75%

+26.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.47%

-61.83%

+49.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.02%

-57.63%

+24.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.75%

34.94%

-20.19%

Volatility

ESOA vs. SMMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) is 19.04%, while Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) has a volatility of 23.99%. This indicates that ESOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESOASMMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.04%

23.99%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.29%

56.65%

-9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.01%

75.61%

-12.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.02%

185.08%

-109.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.08%

144.46%

-48.38%

Dividends

ESOA vs. SMMT - Dividend Comparison

ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while SMMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESOA
Energy Services Of America Corp
0.72%1.47%0.24%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.49%0.00%5.88%
SMMT
Summit Therapeutics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ESOA vs. SMMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Services Of America Corp and Summit Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
93.17M
0
(ESOA) Total Revenue
(SMMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ESOA and SMMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMMT has higher volatility (23.99%) compared to ESOA (19.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESOA dropped -76.67% vs SMMT's -95.75%.

ESOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESOA and SMMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer