ESOA vs. HWM
ESOA (Energy Services Of America Corp) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — ESOA in Engineering & Construction, HWM in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, ESOA returned 28.68%/yr vs 33.28%/yr for HWM. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESOA vs. HWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 104.87% return, which is significantly higher than HWM's 29.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ESOA has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 28.68%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 33.28% annualized return.
ESOA
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 104.87%
- 6M
- 93.12%
- 1Y
- 58.55%
- 3Y*
- 88.21%
- 5Y*
- 50.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.68%
HWM
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 33.60%
- 1Y
- 54.95%
- 3Y*
- 79.69%
- 5Y*
- 50.00%
- 10Y*
- 33.28%
ESOA vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 104.87% | -34.42% | 111.44% | 140.93% | -22.02% | 223.53% | 32.47% | -30.56% | 38.82% | -36.06% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 29.23% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESOA and HWM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2012 | 0.05 |
The correlation between ESOA and HWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ESOA:
$293.39M
HWM:
$106.66B
ESOA:
$0.55
HWM:
$4.31
ESOA:
30.54
HWM:
61.42
ESOA:
0.71
HWM:
1.04
ESOA:
0.64
HWM:
12.42
ESOA:
3.60
HWM:
19.32
ESOA:
$440.96M
HWM:
$8.62B
ESOA:
$52.66M
HWM:
$2.81B
ESOA:
$27.20M
HWM:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESOA vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank
ESOA
HWM
ESOA vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESOA | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 3.46 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 9.77 | -6.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESOA vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and HWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESOA | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.67% | -88.30% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.16% | -15.89% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.43% | -19.41% | -38.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.43% | -21.61% | -35.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.62% | -64.81% | -4.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -3.26% | -9.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.02% | -31.00% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.75% | 5.61% | +9.14% |
Volatility
ESOA vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison
Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) has a higher volatility of 19.04% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 11.03%. This indicates that ESOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESOA | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.04% | 11.03% | +8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.29% | 25.03% | +22.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.01% | 31.46% | +31.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.02% | 32.20% | +43.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.08% | 39.82% | +56.26% |
Dividends
ESOA vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison
ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than HWM's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 0.72% | 1.47% | 0.24% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
Financials
ESOA vs. HWM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Services Of America Corp and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESOA vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison
ESOA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 10.23M and revenue of 93.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.0%.
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
ESOA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 1.06M and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
ESOA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 215.55K and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESOA and HWM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESOA has higher volatility (19.04%) compared to HWM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESOA dropped -76.67% vs HWM's -88.30%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESOA and HWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer