ESMV vs. BUFH
ESMV (iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, ESMV returned 5.82% vs 6.20% for BUFH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESMV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
ESMV vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.
ESMV
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESMV vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESMV iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 4.26% | 1.49% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.30% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESMV and BUFH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESMV vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
ESMV
BUFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ESMV vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESMV | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESMV vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESMV | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -1.53% | -18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -1.53% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -0.26% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -0.18% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | — | — |
Volatility
ESMV vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESMV | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 2.38% | +7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 2.38% | +10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 2.38% | +10.82% |
ESMV vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESMV vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESMV iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.54% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.75% | 1.66% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESMV and BUFH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, BUFH leads with 6.20% vs 5.82% for ESMV. On fees, ESMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFH has performed better with a 6.20% return vs 5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
ESMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
ESMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESMV and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for ESMV and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer