ESMV vs. CHPS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).
ESMV and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both ESMV and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESMV or CHPS.
Correlation
The correlation between ESMV and CHPS is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ESMV vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ESMV:
13.45%
CHPS:
22.13%
ESMV:
-19.77%
CHPS:
-1.49%
ESMV:
-3.66%
CHPS:
0.00%
Returns By Period
ESMV
3.01%
3.98%
-2.38%
9.98%
N/A
N/A
CHPS
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESMV vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ESMV vs. CHPS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ESMV
CHPS
ESMV vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ESMV vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
ESMV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ESMV iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ESMV vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -1.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and CHPS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ESMV vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...