PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESMV vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESMV vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.57% return.


ESMV

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
4.06%
6M
3.40%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESMV vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
4.06%5.34%13.06%12.20%-11.08%3.13%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
7.57%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ESMV and BBUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021

0.75

The correlation between ESMV and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESMV vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESMV
ESMV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ESMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ESMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESMV vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESMVBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.33

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.49

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

10.97

-8.22

ESMV vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMV and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESMV vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMVBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-35.35%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-9.21%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

-19.01%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-3.47%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-5.43%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.08%

+0.21%

Volatility

ESMV vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) is 2.82%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that ESMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMVBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

5.00%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

9.95%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

12.59%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

17.14%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

19.59%

-6.39%

ESMV vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESMV vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.55%1.56%1.71%1.75%1.66%0.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESMV and BBUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ESMV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESMV dropped -19.77% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 3-year performance, BBUS leads with 20.70% vs 10.45% for ESMV. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, ESMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 20.70% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESMV.

ESMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.

ESMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESMV and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESMV and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer