ESML vs. AVDV
ESML (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. ESML is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESML returned 7.18%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for AVDV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESML charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
ESML vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESML having a 16.26% return and AVDV slightly lower at 16.04%.
ESML
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 44.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ESML vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 16.26% | 10.62% | 12.01% | 17.27% | -17.28% | 19.28% | 19.56% | 8.48% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.04% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESML and AVDV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ESML and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESML vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESML
AVDV
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
ESML
AVDV
Technology
ESML
AVDV
Financial Services
ESML
AVDV
Healthcare
ESML
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
ESML
AVDV
Real Estate
ESML
AVDV
Energy
ESML
AVDV
Basic Materials
ESML
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
ESML
AVDV
Utilities
ESML
AVDV
Communication Services
ESML
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESML vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
ESML
AVDV
ESML vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESML | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.52 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 3.37 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 13.67 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESML | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.86 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.80 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.80 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
ESML vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, roughly equal to the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESML | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.97% | -43.01% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -13.19% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.68% | -14.17% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.61% | -28.08% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -1.35% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -6.77% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.24% | -0.79% |
Volatility
ESML vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) is 4.25%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that ESML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESML | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 4.92% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 13.07% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 15.56% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 17.30% | +3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 19.73% | +3.67% |
ESML vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESML vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.74% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 0.95% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESML and AVDV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVDV has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to ESML (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESML dropped -41.97% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 7.18% for ESML. On fees, ESML is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, ESML has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESML is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.95% for ESML.
ESML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ESML and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESML and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer