PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESLT vs. WPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESLT vs. WPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 48.00% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ESLT has outperformed WPM with an annualized return of 26.53%, while WPM has yielded a comparatively lower 20.59% annualized return.


ESLT

1D
-6.48%
1M
9.58%
YTD
48.00%
6M
66.16%
1Y
98.98%
3Y*
60.86%
5Y*
46.38%
10Y*
26.53%

WPM

1D
3.05%
1M
-18.24%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
20.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLT vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
48.00%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%34.77%-14.56%37.62%-13.22%32.65%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-0.90%110.52%15.24%27.91%-7.53%4.22%41.82%54.62%-10.04%16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLT and WPM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESLT:

$41.10B

WPM:

$52.82B

EPS

ESLT:

$12.36

WPM:

$3.96

PE Ratio

ESLT:

69.08

WPM:

29.33

PEG Ratio

ESLT:

3.27

WPM:

0.78

PS Ratio

ESLT:

4.93

WPM:

19.23

PB Ratio

ESLT:

9.65

WPM:

5.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESLT:

$8.23B

WPM:

$2.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESLT:

$2.03B

WPM:

$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

ESLT:

$861.06M

WPM:

$2.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESLT vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM
WPM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESLT vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESLTWPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.14

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

0.84

+2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

2.40

+8.21

ESLT vs. WPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the WPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESLT and WPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESLT vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and WPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESLTWPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.79%

-48.64%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.98%

-34.92%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

-34.92%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-43.29%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

-48.64%

+15.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

-29.73%

+14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-18.87%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.36%

12.22%

-2.86%

Volatility

ESLT vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison

Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a higher volatility of 19.89% compared to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) at 16.76%. This indicates that ESLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESLTWPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.89%

16.76%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.93%

39.19%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.11%

45.96%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

35.44%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.42%

36.78%

-7.36%

Dividends

ESLT vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison

ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than WPM's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.36%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.62%0.56%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%0.00%

Financials

ESLT vs. WPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elbit Systems Ltd and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.19B
888.98M
(ESLT) Total Revenue
(WPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESLT vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Elbit Systems Ltd and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
25.2%
77.5%
Portfolio components
ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

WPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 689.26M and revenue of 888.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

WPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 666.92M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

WPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 573.98M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESLT and WPM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESLT has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to WPM (16.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs WPM's -48.64%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESLT and WPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer