ESLT vs. HLF
ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) and HLF (Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.) are both stocks. ESLT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while HLF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ESLT returned 26.53%/yr vs -8.54%/yr for HLF. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESLT vs. HLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 48.00% return, which is significantly higher than HLF's -6.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ESLT has outperformed HLF with an annualized return of 26.53%, while HLF has yielded a comparatively lower -8.54% annualized return.
ESLT
- 1D
- -6.48%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 48.00%
- 6M
- 66.16%
- 1Y
- 98.98%
- 3Y*
- 60.86%
- 5Y*
- 46.38%
- 10Y*
- 26.53%
HLF
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- -1.03%
- 5Y*
- -25.81%
- 10Y*
- -8.54%
ESLT vs. HLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 48.00% | 125.14% | 22.17% | 31.30% | -4.82% | 34.77% | -14.56% | 37.62% | -13.22% | 32.65% |
HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. | -6.21% | 92.68% | -56.16% | 2.55% | -63.65% | -14.82% | 0.80% | -19.13% | 74.10% | 40.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESLT and HLF is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2004 | 0.16 |
The correlation between ESLT and HLF shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ESLT:
$41.10B
HLF:
$1.31B
ESLT:
$12.36
HLF:
$2.29
ESLT:
69.08
HLF:
5.28
ESLT:
4.93
HLF:
0.25
ESLT:
$8.23B
HLF:
$5.13B
ESLT:
$2.03B
HLF:
$3.93B
ESLT:
$861.06M
HLF:
$423.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESLT vs. HLF — Risk / Return Rank
ESLT
HLF
ESLT vs. HLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESLT | HLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.18 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 1.07 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | 2.50 | +8.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESLT vs. HLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, smaller than the maximum HLF drawdown of -91.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and HLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESLT | HLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.79% | -91.69% | +37.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.98% | -43.39% | +17.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.98% | -72.73% | +46.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -90.58% | +57.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.89% | -91.69% | +58.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.71% | -80.33% | +64.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -31.70% | +17.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.36% | 18.62% | -9.26% |
Volatility
ESLT vs. HLF - Volatility Comparison
Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a higher volatility of 19.89% compared to Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) at 12.61%. This indicates that ESLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESLT | HLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.89% | 12.61% | +7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.93% | 39.52% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.11% | 61.20% | -17.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.66% | 60.85% | -27.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 49.94% | -20.52% |
Dividends
ESLT vs. HLF - Dividend Comparison
ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while HLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 0.36% | 0.47% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.63% |
HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESLT vs. HLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elbit Systems Ltd and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESLT vs. HLF - Profitability Comparison
ESLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.
HLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.
ESLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
HLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported an operating income of -5.50M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
ESLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
HLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a net income of 61.90M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESLT and HLF have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESLT has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to HLF (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs HLF's -91.69%.
ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESLT and HLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer