ESLG vs. VV
ESLG (Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Eventide, while VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index. ESLG is actively managed, while VV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESLG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
ESLG vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESLG achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 7.81% return.
ESLG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
ESLG vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 11.31% | -0.29% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 7.81% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESLG and VV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESLG vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
ESLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VV
ESLG vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESLG | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESLG vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESLG drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLG and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESLG | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -54.81% | +42.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -3.30% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -6.82% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
ESLG vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESLG | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 12.63% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 17.33% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 18.21% | -1.45% |
ESLG vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESLG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESLG vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
ESLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than VV's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, ESLG and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESLG.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.15% for ESLG.
ESLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESLG and 0.04% for VV.
Find the right allocation for ESLG and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer