ESLG vs. ITOT
ESLG (Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Eventide, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. ESLG is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESLG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
ESLG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESLG achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 8.86% return.
ESLG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
ESLG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 11.31% | -0.29% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 8.86% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESLG and ITOT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESLG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
ESLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITOT
ESLG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESLG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESLG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESLG drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLG and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESLG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -55.20% | +42.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -2.86% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -6.96% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
ESLG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESLG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 12.82% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 17.46% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 18.28% | -1.52% |
ESLG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESLG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESLG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
ESLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than ITOT's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ESLG and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESLG.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.15% for ESLG.
ESLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eventide and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESLG and 0.03% for ITOT.
Find the right allocation for ESLG and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer