ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESIN.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and 3190.HK (Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIN.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while 3190.HK is a Dividend fund tracking the Hang Seng Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong (Selected Corporations) High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESIN.DE returned 19.52%/yr vs 22.68%/yr for 3190.HK. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIN.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for 3190.HK.

Performance

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESIN.DE is traded in EUR, while 3190.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3190.HK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESIN.DE having a 8.75% return and 3190.HK slightly lower at 8.54%.

ESIN.DE

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 8.75%
• 6M: 11.05%
• 1Y: 15.27%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 12.86%
• 10Y*: —

3190.HK

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -3.04%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 4.76%
• 1Y: 26.97%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ESIN.DE iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	8.75%	25.30%	14.45%	26.98%	6.43%
3190.HK Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF	8.54%	23.14%	44.38%	8.80%	-5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIN.DE and 3190.HK is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022	0.08

Return for Risk

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIN.DE

ESIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
ESIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ESIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ESIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 23
ESIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ESIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

3190.HK

3190.HK Risk / Return Rank: 66
3190.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
3190.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
3190.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 60
3190.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
3190.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESIN.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.77	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.45	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.30	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	3.36	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	8.82	-4.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the 3190.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIN.DE and 3190.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIN.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	1.77	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.01	-0.31

Drawdowns

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, which is greater than 3190.HK's maximum drawdown of -16.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.DE and 3190.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIN.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.12%	-16.51%	-12.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-8.25%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.30%	-12.08%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-4.50%	+1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-4.80%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	3.11%	+0.50%

Volatility

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK) at 3.57%. This indicates that ESIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3190.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIN.DE	3190.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	3.57%	+2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.51%	11.23%	+5.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.60%	15.71%	+3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.85%	19.44%	-0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	19.44%	-0.63%

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIN.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than 3190.HK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIN.DE vs. 3190.HK - Dividend Comparison

ESIN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 3190.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
3190.HK Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF	6.02%	6.12%	6.82%	8.53%	3.11%
ESIN.DE iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIN.DE and 3190.HK in my portfolio?

ESIN.DE and 3190.HK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIN.DE or 3190.HK?

On fees, ESIN.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIN.DE or 3190.HK?

ESIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for 3190.HK.

What is the main difference between ESIN.DE and 3190.HK?

ESIN.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while 3190.HK is Dividend. ESIN.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while 3190.HK tracks Hang Seng Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong (Selected Corporations) High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fubon. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.DE and 0.60% for 3190.HK.