PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIH.L is traded in GBP, while LBNK.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LBNK.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIH.L achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than LBNK.DE's 8.65% return.


ESIH.L

1D
0.82%
1M
1.49%
YTD
-0.97%
6M
0.00%
1Y
8.13%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*

LBNK.DE

1D
4.13%
1M
5.85%
YTD
8.65%
6M
13.82%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
42.85%
5Y*
28.66%
10Y*
16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
-0.97%12.77%-0.54%5.46%1.56%17.09%-10.87%
LBNK.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc
8.65%85.85%26.86%23.98%6.85%28.03%3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIH.L and LBNK.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.20

The correlation between ESIH.L and LBNK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIH.L
ESIH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNK.DE
LBNK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESIH.LLBNK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.34

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

3.00

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

10.50

-9.30

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIH.L and LBNK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIH.L drawdown since its inception was -24.47%, smaller than the maximum LBNK.DE drawdown of -73.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIH.L and LBNK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIH.LLBNK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.47%

-73.23%

+48.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.78%

-15.41%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.47%

-18.47%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-29.08%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

0.00%

-9.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-42.23%

+34.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

4.42%

+1.33%

Volatility

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) is 5.29%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that ESIH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBNK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIH.LLBNK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

6.46%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

18.40%

-6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.83%

22.13%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

22.91%

-5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

24.23%

-6.32%

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIH.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNK.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESIH.L vs. LBNK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIH.L nor LBNK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIH.L and LBNK.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIH.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIH.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.

ESIH.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while LBNK.DE is Financials Equities. ESIH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while LBNK.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIH.L and 0.30% for LBNK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIH.L and LBNK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer