ESIH.L vs. IITU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L).
ESIH.L and IITU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESIH.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020. IITU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both ESIH.L and IITU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIH.L iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | 0.01% | 12.76% | -0.46% | 5.44% | 1.56% | 17.09% | 0.82% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.60% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 6.35% |
Different Trading Currencies
ESIH.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIH.L achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than IITU.L's -7.60% return.
ESIH.L
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 9.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -7.60%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.71%
- 10Y*
- 23.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIH.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIH.L
IITU.L
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIH.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 1.10 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 1.62 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.21 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.51 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 4.03 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIH.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 1.10 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.86 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.09 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIH.L and IITU.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIH.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIH.L drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIH.L and IITU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIH.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -28.03% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -16.76% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -28.03% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -13.74% | +5.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -5.17% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 6.26% | -2.07% |
Volatility
ESIH.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) have volatilities of 5.39% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESIH.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 5.29% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 14.91% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 23.56% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 21.82% | -6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 21.23% | -6.00% |