ESIH.L vs. INRG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L).
ESIH.L and INRG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESIH.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020. INRG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. It was launched on Jul 9, 2007. Both ESIH.L and INRG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESIH.L or INRG.L.
Key characteristics
| ESIH.L | INRG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.62% | -22.15% |
| 1Y Return | 9.75% | -8.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.19% | -19.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.75 | -0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.14 | -0.39 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 0.96 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.70 | -0.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.52 | -0.74 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.61% | 11.30% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.13% | 23.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.24% | -84.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.57% | -60.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIH.L and INRG.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ESIH.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ESIH.L achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly higher than INRG.L's -22.15% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESIH.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIH.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ESIH.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ESIH.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison
ESIH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIH.L iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.26% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 2.05% | 3.68% | 3.69% | 3.65% | 3.90% | 3.05% | 2.70% |
Drawdowns
ESIH.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIH.L drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -84.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIH.L and INRG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ESIH.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) is 3.56%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that ESIH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.