ESGYX vs. LSGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX).
ESGYX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Mar 30, 2016. LSGRX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on May 16, 1991.
Performance
ESGYX vs. LSGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESGYX vs. LSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund | -9.28% | 15.23% | 13.38% | 18.63% | -22.36% | 18.06% | 32.43% | 33.00% | -6.37% | 29.83% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -14.81% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 31.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGYX achieves a -9.28% return, which is significantly higher than LSGRX's -14.81% return.
ESGYX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -9.36%
- YTD
- -9.28%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- 9.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- —
LSGRX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -9.29%
- YTD
- -14.81%
- 6M
- -14.59%
- 1Y
- 8.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESGYX vs. LSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGYX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGRX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESGYX vs. LSGRX — Risk / Return Rank
ESGYX
LSGRX
ESGYX vs. LSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | 0.26 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | -0.28 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | -0.85 | +1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.26 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.42 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGYX and LSGRX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ESGYX vs. LSGRX - Dividend Comparison
ESGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than LSGRX's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund | 4.89% | 4.44% | 1.99% | 0.61% | 5.28% | 12.16% | 0.54% | 1.84% | 4.39% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.60% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
ESGYX vs. LSGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGYX drawdown since its inception was -34.88%, smaller than the maximum LSGRX drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGYX and LSGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.88% | -63.63% | +28.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -17.83% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.88% | -34.69% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.36% | -17.66% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -18.01% | +11.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 7.78% | -3.49% |
Volatility
ESGYX vs. LSGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) is 3.82%, while Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that ESGYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESGYX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 5.18% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 12.39% | -2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.15% | 25.07% | -6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 22.55% | -4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 20.84% | -3.11% |