ESGV vs. VOTE
ESGV (Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF) and VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGV tracks the FTSE US All Cap Choice Index while VOTE tracks the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGV returned 22.27%/yr vs 22.81%/yr for VOTE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ESGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOTE.
Performance
ESGV vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGV having a 10.74% return and VOTE slightly higher at 11.03%.
ESGV
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
VOTE
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 28.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGV vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 10.74% | 16.48% | 24.69% | 30.79% | -24.04% | 12.17% |
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF | 11.03% | 17.95% | 25.23% | 27.60% | -19.74% | 12.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGV and VOTE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between ESGV and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGV vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGV
VOTE
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ESGV
VOTE
Communication Services
ESGV
VOTE
Financial Services
ESGV
VOTE
Consumer Cyclical
ESGV
VOTE
Healthcare
ESGV
VOTE
Industrials
ESGV
VOTE
Consumer Defensive
ESGV
VOTE
Real Estate
ESGV
VOTE
Basic Materials
ESGV
VOTE
Utilities
ESGV
VOTE
Energy
ESGV
VOTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGV vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGV
VOTE
ESGV vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGV | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.10 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 14.23 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGV | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.34 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.80 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
ESGV vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than VOTE's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and VOTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGV | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -25.71% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -9.10% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.41% | -19.08% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.70% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -6.14% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 1.98% | +0.72% |
Volatility
ESGV vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) at 2.96%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGV | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 2.96% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 9.20% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 12.08% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 17.15% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 17.15% | +3.43% |
ESGV vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGV vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison
ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than VOTE's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.42% | 0.95% | 1.11% | 1.27% | 0.28% |
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF | 0.90% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.54% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, ESGV and VOTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESGV has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to VOTE (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs VOTE's -25.71%.
On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 22.81% vs 22.27% for ESGV. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 22.81% return vs 22.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ESGV.
VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.
ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.05% for VOTE.
VOTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGV and VOTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer