PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGU vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGU vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGU having a 11.06% return and SPTM slightly higher at 11.10%.


ESGU

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.06%
6M
10.93%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*

SPTM

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.13%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGU vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
11.06%16.90%24.31%25.79%-20.27%26.89%22.54%31.72%-4.32%21.07%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.10%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU and SPTM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016

0.95

The correlation between ESGU and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGU vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGU
SPTM

Technology

38.7%
34.0%

Financial Services

11.5%
12.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.6%

Industrials

8.4%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.0%

Technology

ESGU
38.7%
SPTM
34.0%

Financial Services

ESGU
11.5%
SPTM
12.1%

Communication Services

ESGU
9.8%
SPTM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGU
9.4%
SPTM
10.3%

Healthcare

ESGU
8.4%
SPTM
8.6%

Industrials

ESGU
8.4%
SPTM
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

ESGU
3.9%
SPTM
4.8%

Energy

ESGU
3.5%
SPTM
3.7%

Utilities

ESGU
2.4%
SPTM
2.3%

Real Estate

ESGU
2.1%
SPTM
2.3%

Basic Materials

ESGU
1.6%
SPTM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGU vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGUSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.22

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

15.01

-1.27

ESGU vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGUSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.36

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.80

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.46

+0.38

Drawdowns

ESGU vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGUSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-54.80%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-8.68%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-18.87%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

-24.14%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.67%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-9.05%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.86%

+0.17%

Volatility

ESGU vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGUSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.88%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

8.92%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

11.88%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.87%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

18.03%

+0.57%

ESGU vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGU vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
0.92%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, ESGU and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGU has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.38% vs 12.74% for ESGU. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 12.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ESGU.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.92% for ESGU.

ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGU and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGU and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer