ESGU vs. SPTM
ESGU (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGU tracks the MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGU returned 12.74%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ESGU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
ESGU vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGU having a 11.06% return and SPTM slightly higher at 11.10%.
ESGU
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
ESGU vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF | 11.06% | 16.90% | 24.31% | 25.79% | -20.27% | 26.89% | 22.54% | 31.72% | -4.32% | 21.07% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 21.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGU and SPTM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ESGU and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGU vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGU
SPTM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ESGU
SPTM
Financial Services
ESGU
SPTM
Communication Services
ESGU
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
ESGU
SPTM
Healthcare
ESGU
SPTM
Industrials
ESGU
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
ESGU
SPTM
Energy
ESGU
SPTM
Utilities
ESGU
SPTM
Real Estate
ESGU
SPTM
Basic Materials
ESGU
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGU vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
ESGU
SPTM
ESGU vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGU | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.22 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.75 | 15.01 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGU | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.36 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.46 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
ESGU vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGU | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -54.80% | +20.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -8.68% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -18.87% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.15% | -24.14% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.67% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -9.05% | +4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.86% | +0.17% |
Volatility
ESGU vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGU | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.88% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 8.92% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 11.88% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 16.87% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 18.03% | +0.57% |
ESGU vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGU vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.18% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.06% | 1.27% | 1.32% | 1.73% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, ESGU and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESGU has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.38% vs 12.74% for ESGU. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 12.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ESGU.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.92% for ESGU.
ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGU and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGU and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer