PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGU vs. EAOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGU vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than EAOA's 9.93% return.


ESGU

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.06%
6M
10.93%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*

EAOA

1D
-0.71%
1M
4.36%
YTD
9.93%
6M
10.44%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGU vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
11.06%16.90%24.31%25.79%-20.27%26.89%23.53%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
9.93%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%14.52%19.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU and EAOA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.96

The correlation between ESGU and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGU vs. EAOA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGU
EAOA

Technology

38.7%
28.9%

Financial Services

11.5%
13.5%

Communication Services

9.8%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
7.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
6.8%

Industrials

8.4%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.4%

Technology

ESGU
38.7%
EAOA
28.9%

Financial Services

ESGU
11.5%
EAOA
13.5%

Communication Services

ESGU
9.8%
EAOA
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGU
9.4%
EAOA
7.7%

Healthcare

ESGU
8.4%
EAOA
6.8%

Industrials

ESGU
8.4%
EAOA
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

ESGU
3.9%
EAOA
3.7%

Energy

ESGU
3.5%
EAOA
3.0%

Utilities

ESGU
2.4%
EAOA
2.3%

Real Estate

ESGU
2.1%
EAOA
1.6%

Basic Materials

ESGU
1.6%
EAOA
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGU vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGUEAOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.00

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

13.30

+0.45

ESGU vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU and EAOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGUEAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.28

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.65

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.93

-0.09

Drawdowns

ESGU vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than EAOA's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and EAOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGUEAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-25.06%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-8.17%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-13.84%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

-25.06%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.71%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-5.31%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.84%

+0.19%

Volatility

ESGU vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) is 2.92%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that ESGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGUEAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.39%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

8.64%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

10.75%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

13.25%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

13.14%

+5.46%

ESGU vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGU vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than EAOA's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
1.95%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
0.92%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ESGU and EAOA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAOA has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to ESGU (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs EAOA's -25.06%.

On 5-year performance, ESGU leads with 12.74% vs 8.52% for EAOA. On fees, ESGU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ESGU has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGU has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOA.

EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.92% for ESGU.

ESGU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EAOA is Diversified Portfolio. ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGU and 0.18% for EAOA.

ESGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGU and EAOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer