ESGU vs. DFND
ESGU (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGU tracks the MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGU returned 12.74%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGU charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
ESGU vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESGU
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
ESGU vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF | 11.06% | 16.90% | 24.31% | 25.79% | -20.27% | 26.89% | 22.54% | 31.72% | -4.32% | 21.07% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGU and DFND is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESGU and DFND has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ESGU vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGU
DFND
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ESGU
DFND
Financial Services
ESGU
DFND
Communication Services
ESGU
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
ESGU
DFND
Healthcare
ESGU
DFND
Industrials
ESGU
DFND
Consumer Defensive
ESGU
DFND
Energy
ESGU
DFND
Utilities
ESGU
DFND
-
Real Estate
ESGU
DFND
Basic Materials
ESGU
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGU vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
ESGU
DFND
ESGU vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGU | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.02 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 0.07 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.75 | 0.13 | +13.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGU | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 0.02 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.21 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.36 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
ESGU vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGU | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -22.65% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -3.44% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -12.56% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.15% | -22.65% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -3.69% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -5.70% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.70% | -1.67% |
Volatility
ESGU vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that ESGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGU | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 0.00% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 6.16% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 10.92% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 22.46% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 19.09% | -0.49% |
ESGU vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGU vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.18% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.06% | 1.27% | 1.32% | 1.73% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGU and DFND have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGU has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 5-year performance, ESGU leads with 12.74% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, ESGU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGU has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
ESGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGU and 1.50% for DFND.
ESGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGU and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer