PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ESGP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.62%
6M
9.14%
YTD
11.07%
1Y
15.42%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
10Y*

RM8U.DE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESGP.DE
Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF
11.07%5.79%12.94%2.10%-2.36%2.90%
RM8U.DE
HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGP.DE
ESGP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

RM8U.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGP.DERM8U.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGP.DERM8U.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

Volatility

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGP.DERM8U.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RM8U.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGP.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESGP.DE nor RM8U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, RM8U.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RM8U.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.

ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index, while RM8U.DE tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ESGP.DE and 0.22% for RM8U.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGP.DE and RM8U.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer