ESGN vs. NDIV
ESGN (Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF) and NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGN is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while NDIV is a Energy Equities fund tracking the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGN returned 21.02%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for NDIV. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESGN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for NDIV.
Performance
ESGN vs. NDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than NDIV's 31.93% return.
ESGN
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.17%
NDIV
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- YTD
- 31.93%
- 1Y
- 32.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $574.94K | $759.83K | $688.70K | |
| $378.89K | $377.35K | $495.03K |
ESGN vs. NDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 12.31% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | 4.22% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 31.93% | 2.85% | 6.18% | 15.52% | 1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGN and NDIV is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESGN and NDIV has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ESGN vs. NDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGN
NDIV
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
ESGN
NDIV
Financial Services
ESGN
NDIV
Energy
ESGN
NDIV
Utilities
ESGN
NDIV
-
Technology
ESGN
NDIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESGN
NDIV
-
Healthcare
ESGN
NDIV
-
Consumer Defensive
ESGN
NDIV
-
Basic Materials
ESGN
NDIV
Communication Services
ESGN
NDIV
-
Real Estate
ESGN
NDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGN vs. NDIV — Risk / Return Rank
ESGN
NDIV
ESGN vs. NDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGN | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.28 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.78 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 6.86 | +2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGN vs. NDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than NDIV's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and NDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGN | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -19.73% | -21.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -11.56% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -19.73% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -4.60% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -4.31% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 4.68% | -1.72% |
Volatility
ESGN vs. NDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) is 3.92%, while Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that ESGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGN | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 5.26% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 13.69% | -2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 19.39% | -5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 20.88% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 20.88% | -4.50% |
ESGN vs. NDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NDIV's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGN vs. NDIV - Dividend Comparison
ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than NDIV's 7.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 9.30% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 7.79% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGN and NDIV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDIV has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to ESGN (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs NDIV's -19.73%.
On 3-year performance, ESGN leads with 21.02% vs 15.51% for NDIV. On fees, ESGN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ESGN has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 21.02% return vs 15.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for NDIV.
ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.30%, compared with 7.79% for NDIV.
ESGN is categorized as Dividend, while NDIV is Energy Equities. ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while NDIV tracks EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.59% for NDIV.
ESGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGN and NDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer