ESGG vs. TLTD
ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and TLTD (FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while TLTD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGG returned 12.78%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for TLTD. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for TLTD.
Performance
ESGG vs. TLTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than TLTD's 8.45% return.
ESGG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
TLTD
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
ESGG vs. TLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 14.72% | 24.01% | 14.48% | 25.57% | -18.66% | 23.76% | 17.32% | 29.10% | -8.44% | 23.60% |
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 8.45% | 39.69% | 4.78% | 17.19% | -13.74% | 12.84% | 4.21% | 21.26% | -17.57% | 26.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG and TLTD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ESGG and TLTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGG vs. TLTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGG
TLTD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
ESGG
TLTD
Financial Services
ESGG
TLTD
Healthcare
ESGG
TLTD
Industrials
ESGG
TLTD
Consumer Defensive
ESGG
TLTD
Energy
ESGG
TLTD
Consumer Cyclical
ESGG
TLTD
Basic Materials
ESGG
TLTD
Utilities
ESGG
TLTD
Real Estate
ESGG
TLTD
Communication Services
ESGG
TLTD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG vs. TLTD — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG
TLTD
ESGG vs. TLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGG | TLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.62 | 1.86 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.69 | 2.60 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.21 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | 8.49 | +6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGG | TLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.86 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.60 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.52 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
ESGG vs. TLTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum TLTD drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and TLTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG | TLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -40.62% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -12.11% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -13.10% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -28.96% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -2.35% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -7.68% | +3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 3.15% | -1.10% |
Volatility
ESGG vs. TLTD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 3.76%, while FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG | TLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 4.34% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 11.99% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 14.46% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 15.97% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 16.81% | -0.30% |
ESGG vs. TLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG vs. TLTD - Dividend Comparison
ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than TLTD's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.84% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 3.08% | 3.44% | 3.88% | 3.39% | 2.76% | 3.44% | 2.04% | 3.46% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG and TLTD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTD has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to ESGG (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs TLTD's -40.62%.
On 5-year performance, ESGG leads with 12.78% vs 9.51% for TLTD. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.
TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.21% for ESGG.
ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TLTD is Global Equities. ESGG tracks STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.39% for TLTD.
ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGG and TLTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer